Arevalo v. State

PER CURIAM. We find no merit in Luis Humberto Arevalo’s appeal of his convictions for sexual battery with a deadly weapon, sexual battery with threat of injury, and kidnapping with intent to commit a felony, and affirm. We also affirm the trial court’s order declaring Arevalo to be a sexual predator, and in doing so certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). AFFIRMED. CONFLICT CERTIFIED. PETERSON, GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.