Loading…

Pate v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Pate v. State

2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5893 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 14, 2005

Full text

Harold B. PATE v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Hughes v. State, 826 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). ERVIN, PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ervin, Padovano, Thomas
Cluster ID: 7833055

Citations

2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5893
902 So. 2d 203
2005 WL 901198

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service