Loading…

State v. Soto — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Soto

2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13587 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 24, 2005

Full text

The STATE of Florida v. David SOTO

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Franquiz v. State, 682 So.2d 536 (Fla.1996); State v. Sachs, 526 So.2d 48 (Fla.1988).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Gersten, Rothenberg, Suarez
Cluster ID: 7834720

Citations

2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13587
908 So. 2d 1177
2005 WL 2044010

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service