Mills v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burch [851] field v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). AFFIRMED. KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, concur.