Opinion

Hyers v. State

2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18761 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 30, 2005

Full text

James Hollis HYERS v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). AFFIRMED. ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.