Gerald v. State

PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Chandler v. Dugger, 634 So.2d 1066 (Fla.1994)(holding that habeas corpus is not to be used for additional appeals of issues that could have been, should have been, or were raised on direct appeal); Gray v. Wainwright, 442 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)(holding that habe-as corpus is not a substitute for a direct appeal). ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.