Erickson v. Erickson

PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of an Order on Writ of Civil Attachment. Because the trial court’s finding that appellant had the ability to pay the purge amount set is not supported by competent substantial evidence, we are constrained to reverse. See, e.g., Stebbins v. Stebbins, 754 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Perez v. Perez, 599 So.2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). REVERSED. ERVIN, WEBSTER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.