Loading…

Cajuste v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cajuste v. State

2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1783 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 14, 2007

Full text

Michael CAJUSTE v. The STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Pope v. State, 702 So.2d 221 (Fla.1997).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Fletcher, Gersten, Green
Cluster ID: 7844158

Citations

2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1783
949 So. 2d 1108
2007 WL 465563

Cited by

Sell v. Sell
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 14, 2007

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service