Full text
R.E.P. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES and The Guardian ad Litem Program
PER CURIAM.
Based on the facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying R.E.P.’s motion for continuance. See L.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 946 So.2d 42 (Fla. 4th
[990] DCA 2006). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order adjudicating J.S. dependent as to R.E.P.
Affirmed.