James v. State

PER CURIAM. The summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, but without prejudice to appellant seeking relief through administrative remedies or a proper, timely rule 3.850 motion. See Canty v. State, 884 So.2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.