A.B. v. State

PER CURIAM. A.B. seeks to reverse an adjudication of delinquency and sentence. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the State’s case was based on direct, not circumstantial, evidence, and conclude that there was substantial, competent evidence to support the judgment. See Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So.2d 495 (Fla.2005); F.D. v. State, 927 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); I.M. v. State, 917 So.2d 927 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Affirmed.