Full text
William G. Schmid v. Stephen Doerrer Stephen Doerrer v. William G. Schmid
Per Curiam.
Our review of the record, briefs and oral argument convinces us that the conclusions reached by the attorney trial referee and accepted by the trial court are more than adequately supported by the subordinate facts found. Clark v. Drska, 1 Conn. App. 481, 484-85, 473 A.2d 325 (1984).
The judgment is affirmed.