Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank

Per Curiam: On the authority of Kelso v. Norton, 65 Kan. 778, 70 Pac. 896, 93 Am. St. Rep. 308, and Henthorn v. Security Co., 70 Kan. 808, 79 Pac. 653, this case is affirmed. Under the uncontroverted facts, the only legal right, if any, the plaintiff has in the land in question is to redeem and have an accounting for rents.