Opinion

Security Bank v. Bell

32 Minn. 409 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Nov 12, 1884

Full text

Security Bank of Minnesota v. S. N. Bell

By the Court. There was no conflict in the evidence as to the transaction upon which the note sued on was given, and there is no question that it showed an entire want of consideration. Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8009722

Citations

32 Minn. 409
1884 Minn. LEXIS 181
21 N.W. 470

Cited by

Gage v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jul 13, 1923
First National Bank of Poteau v. Allen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1923
Luing v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 6, 1919
Bank of Montreal v. Beecher
Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 19, 1916
First State Bank of Nortonville v. Morton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jan 19, 1912
Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Van Valkenburg
Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 6, 1910
Turle v. Sargent
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Dec 16, 1895
Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Dedrick
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jul 2, 1895
Lipsmeier v. Vehslage
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Oct 6, 1886

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.