Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.

Gilfillan, C. J. So far as the defendant relies for a defence upon dedication of the real estate to public use, and the right of plaintiff to bringejeetment, the questions are disposed of by the opinion in Watson v. Chicago, Mil. & St. Paul Ry. Co., supra, p. 321. Order reversed. Note. A motion for veargument of this case was denied July 1, 1891.