Full text
Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Ole A. Pikop
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Gilfillan
- Dissent — Canty
Gilfillan, C. J.
This case comes within Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544, (11 N. W. 77;) Horton v. Kelly, 40 Minn. 193, (41 N. W. 1031;) and Blake v. Boisjoli, 51 Minn. 296, (53 N. W. 637,)—in -which it was held that a creditor is not defrauded by his debtor conveying real estate incumbered beyond its value, and that the conveyance is not void, though made with intent to defraud such creditor, — and must be'controlled by those decisions.
Judgment affirmed.
