Full text
United States v. John Frilando
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6439
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JOHN ANTHONY FRILANDO, a/k/a Chino Frilando,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:97-cr-00084-CWH-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Anthony Frilando, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:
John Anthony Frilando appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frilando, No. 4:97-cr-00084-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251–52 (4th Cir. 2009) (holding that § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize sentence below minimum of amended Guidelines range); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2) (2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.