Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Rooks

Calhoon, J., delivered the opinion of the court. . We cannot hold that the damage in this case can be referred to the act of the railway company as the proximate cause. Meyer v. King, 72 Miss., 1; Robinson v. Gage, 27 So. Rep., 998; Illinois, etc., R. R. Co. v. Woolley, 77 Miss., 927. Reversed.