Edwards v. Watkins

Gamble, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court. 1. Edwards sued Watkins on a negotiable promissory note, made by Watkins to one Keller, and endorsed to plaintiff. The writ was returnable to the September term, 1851, but being served too late for that term, it became a return to the February term following. At the September term, the defendant appeared and asked time to answer, which was extended to the fourth of October. No answer was filed at that term, but at the February term, after the time for answering had expired, the plaintiff took a judgment for want of an answer. On the day this judgment was taken, an answer appears, to have been filed, and the counsel differ as to which act was first in time, the filing the answer or taking the judgment. The defendant afterwards moved to set aside the judgment, on the ground that his answer was filed before the judgment was taken, and that on filing it the clerk told him no judgment was taken. The affidavit discloses the defence he wishes to make to the note. The record states as the fact that, the defendant, being solemnly called, made default, and that therefore the judgment was given. This statement is to be taken as true, and therefore the answer, although filed on the same day, must have been filed after the default was ordered to be entered. The defendant was out of time with his pleading, and although a udgment by default cannot regularly be entered when an answer is on file, yet the record shows enough to sustain the re 275 gularity of this judgment. The defendant, in Ms affidavit filed with Ms motion, shows no reason or excuse for being actually in default by failing to file Ms answer in time. He was not diligent. Without considering the merits of the defence he wished to make, the motion to set aside the judgment by default, was properly overruled, and the judgment is affirmed with the concurrence of the other Judges.