Opinion

Strickland v. Griz Corp.

92 Nev. 322 · Nevada Supreme Court · May 28, 1976

Full text

STEPHEN STRICKLAND v. GRIZ CORP., a Nevada Corporation, doing business as AL GASPER MOTORS

OPINION Per Curiam: On November 18, 1974, the First Judicial District Court entered an order issuing a preliminary injunction against Stephen Strickland, without providing for, or requiring, a bond to be posted. Strickland has appealed, contending Nevada law compels us to reverse. We agree. NRCP 65(c) provides, in part, that “[n]o restraining order or preliminary injunction shall issue except upon the giving of security by the applicant,...” “Where a bond is required by statute before the issuance of an injunction, it must be exacted or the order will be absolutely void.” Shelton v. District Court, 64 Nev. 487, 494, 185 P.2d 320, 323-324 (1947). Reversed.1 Footnotes [1] Mr. Justice Mowbray did not participate in the consideration and resolution of this appeal.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8084313

Citations

92 Nev. 322
1976 Nev. LEXIS 602
549 P.2d 1406

Cited by

Corpolo Avenue Trust v. Ahmead
Nevada Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2015
Ahmead v. Dist. Ct. (Corpolo Avenue Trust)
Nevada Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2015
Dangberg Holdings Nevada, L.L.C. v. Douglas County
Nevada Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1999

Parentheticals

"Where a bond is required by statute before the issuance of an injunction, it must be exacted or the order will be absolutely void." (quoting Shelton v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 64 Nev. 487, 494, 185 P.2d 320, 323-24 (1947))
Corpolo Avenue Trust v. Ahmead
"Where a bond is required by statute before the issuance of an injunction, it must be exacted or the order will be absolutely void.' (quoting Shelton v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 64 Nev. 487, 494, 185 P.2d 320, 323-24 (1947))
Ahmead v. Dist. Ct. (Corpolo Avenue Trust)