Riggs v. Tyson

Per Curiam. On an abatement no costs are recoverable at law, (a) and this being an entire judgment, cannot be affirmed in part and reversed in part, (b) but must be reversed altogether. Cited in Krumerick v. Krumerick, 2 Gr. 42. Footnotes [(a)] On the first point, see Hullock’s Law of Costs 131; Sayer’s Law of Costs 300, 301, 302; Allen v. Maxey, Barnes 120; Poekling v. Peck, 1 Str. 638. [(b)] On the second point, see Jackson v. Commonwealth, 2 Bin. 79; 2 Bac. Abr. 500.