Full text
Joseph Chumar against Peter B. Wood
By .the Court.
There is no doubt but that is the law. Take a reversal.'
Note,—That a conveyance of chattels unaccompanied with possession is void. See Reed v. Blades, 5 Taunt. 212; Edwards v. Harbin, 2 Term Rep. 587; Meeker et al. v. Wilson, 1 Gallison's Rep. 419; 1 Cranch. 309.