Full text
HATTIE KLOTZ v. NEWARK PAVING COMPANY
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chieb Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Terhune, "Williams, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.