Krakower v. Tauber

BISCHOFF, J. The order appealed from granted a discontinuance of the action, without costs, “after hearing the attorneys for the plaintiff in support of said motion, and the attorneys for the defendant appearing, but not opposing.” For the purposes of an appeal,, the order itself shows the appellant’s consent to the actual direction made, and if in fact counsel had not consented to the omission to impose terms for the discontinuance he should have brought that fact to the attention of the court below, and have procured a resettlement. Upon the record before us there is nothing which calls for the . exercise of the functions of an appellate court (Dawson v. Parsons, 74 Hun, 221, 26 N. Y. Supp. 327), and the appeal is therefore dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.