Loading…

Budman v. Landis — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Budman v. Landis

212 Pa. Super. 284 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1968

Full text

Budman et ux. v. Landis

Opinions in this case

Majority — Cueiam
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion Pee Cueiam, Orders affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Cueiam
Judges: Cueiam, Hannum, Hoffman, Hoppman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight
Cluster ID: 8118378

Citations

212 Pa. Super. 284
1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1113
243 A.2d 155

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service