Loading…

Commonwealth v. Austin — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Austin

212 Pa. Super. 297 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1968

Full text

Commonwealth v. Austin

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoepman

Opinion Per Curiam, Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Hannum, Hoepman, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 8118382

Citations

212 Pa. Super. 297
1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1116
243 A.2d 193

Cited by

Commonwealth v. Buchanan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1971

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service