Loading…

Commonwealth v. Getz — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Getz

222 Pa. Super. 87 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1972

Full text

Commonwealth v. Getz

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoppman

Opinion Per Curiam, Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Hoppman, Jacobs, Packed, Spaulding, Spaurding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 8118628

Citations

222 Pa. Super. 87
1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1240
293 A.2d 117

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service