Loading…

Holmes v. Broodno — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Holmes v. Broodno

1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1312 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1972

Full text

Holmes v. Broodno

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Packed
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion by Packed, J., The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Gab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Packed
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Hoppman, Jacobs, Packed, Packel, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight
Cluster ID: 8118722

Citations

1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1312
222 Pa. Super. 478
294 A.2d 903

Cited by

Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1979
Friedgen v. Evangelical Manor
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1978
James F. Oakley, Inc. v. Sch. Dist. of Phila.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1975
Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1975
Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1972

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service