Protest 955268-G of W. X. Huber Co.

Opinion by Cline, J. It appeared that the jars in question were packed in. cartons which were marked. As the anchovies were not capable of being marked and the .immediate containers, the bottles, were not marked it was held that additional duty was properly assessed. Givaudan v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 115, T. D. 47104) and United States v. Martorelli (12 Ct. Cust. Appls., 327, T. D. 40483) followed.