Loading…

State v. King — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. King

260 Or. App. 561 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 2, 2014

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. KENNETH COREY KING

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Ziska, 253 Or App 82, 288 P3d 1012 (2012), rev allowed, 353 Or 428 (2013).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Armstrong, Carlson, Egan, Nakamoto
Cluster ID: 8165298

Citations

260 Or. App. 561
317 P.3d 901

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service