Loading…

Inda-Rocha v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Inda-Rocha v. State

276 Or. App. 607 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 2016

Full text

HUMBERTO INDA-ROCHA v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent

PER CURIAM Affirmed. Brown v. Baldwin, 131 Or App 356, 885 P2d 707 (1994), rev den, 320 Or 507 (1995).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Shorr
Cluster ID: 8166604

Citations

276 Or. App. 607
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 203
369 P.3d 418

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service