Loading…

Bermejo-Bastarrachea v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Bermejo-Bastarrachea v. State

2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 2016

Full text

RUBEN BERMEJO-BASTARRACHEA v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent

PER CURIAM Affirmed. Benitez-Chacon v. State of Oregon, 178 Or App 352, 37 P3d 1035 (2001).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Dehoog, Sercombe, Tookey
Cluster ID: 8166606

Citations

2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 205
276 Or. App. 609
368 P.3d 83

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service