Loading…

Garges v. Premo — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Garges v. Premo

284 Or. App. 313 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 2017

Full text

DANIEL BRET GARGES v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Respondent

PER CURIAM Affirmed. Keenan v. Hall, 202 Or App 571, 123 P3d 812 (2005), rev den, 342 Or 253 (2006).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Devore, Duncan, Garrett
Cluster ID: 8167170

Citations

284 Or. App. 313
2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 288
390 P.3d 1124
2017 WL 914696

Cited by

Garges v. Premo
Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2018

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service