Loading…

Soto v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Soto v. State

2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 786 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 2017

Full text

GUSTAVO CONDE SOTO v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent

PER CURIAM Affirmed. Chavez v. State of Oregon, 283 Or App 788, 391 P3d 801 (2017).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Devore, Duncan, Garrett
Cluster ID: 8167364

Citations

2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 786
286 Or. App. 303
395 P.3d 959
2017 WL 2569844

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service