Loading…

Churchill v. Rafferty ex rel. Internal Revenue of the Philippine Islands — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Churchill v. Rafferty ex rel. Internal Revenue of the Philippine Islands

63 L. Ed. 436 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 11, 1918

Full text

Francis A. Churchill, Co-partners, under the Firm Name of the Mercantile Advertising Agency v. James F. Rafferty, as Collector of Internal Revenue of the Philippine Islands

Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the nineteenth rule.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8181806

Citations

63 L. Ed. 436
248 U.S. 591
39 S. Ct. 20
1918 U.S. LEXIS 1733

Cited by

Lanigan v. City of Richmond, Department of Public Safety Bureau of Building Inspection
Richmond County Circuit Court · Sep 18, 1978
People v. Stover
New York Court of Appeals · May 9, 1963

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service