Opinion

Tefft v. Grant

279 U.S. 824 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 20, 1929

Full text

Tefft v. Grant, Receiver

Per Curiam: The appeal is disissed for want-of a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8185300

Citations

279 U.S. 824
49 S. Ct. 479

Cited by

State v. Arroyo
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 21, 2009
Easlick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 3, 2004
Rogers v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont) · Jan 13, 1993
In re Grand Jury Subpoena
D. Minnesota · Oct 22, 1992
State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1991
In Re Custodian of Records of Variety Distributing, Inc. United States
Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1991
United States v. Ellwest Stereo Theatres of Memphis, Inc.
Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1991
State v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Dec 19, 1989
United States v. Suntar Roofing, Inc.