Loading…

Wetzel v. Fulton — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Wetzel v. Fulton

79 L. Ed. 640 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 19, 1934

Full text

Wetzel v. Fulton, Superintendent of Banks of Ohio

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction: (1) Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, ante, p. 52; (2) Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U S. 326, 332.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8188754

Citations

79 L. Ed. 640
293 U.S. 531
55 S. Ct. 207
1934 U.S. LEXIS 80

Cited by

Carson v. City of Fort Lauderdale
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 7, 1963
George Allison & Co. v. United States
S.D. New York · Aug 20, 1935
Chandler v. Marlatt
Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1935

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service