Opinion

Timmons v. Security Savings Bank

299 U.S. 503 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 12, 1936

Full text

Per Curiam: The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U. S. 326, 332; Doty v. Love, 295 U. S. 64.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8190426

Citations

299 U.S. 503
57 S. Ct. 15

Cited by

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6085, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9956
Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 1996
National American Insurance v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 1996
In Re Lms Holding Company
Tenth Circuit · Apr 4, 1995
Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1990
Cook v. Tompkins
Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland) · Jul 17, 1986
Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation
Tenth Circuit · Oct 11, 1977
Driver v. Van Cott
Supreme Court of Florida · Dec 15, 1971
Bank of New York v. United States
S.D. New York · Jul 9, 1970