Opinion

Graybar Electric Co. v. Curry

308 U.S. 513 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 6, 1939

Full text

Graybar Electric Co. v. Curry, Commissioner of Revenue

Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Banker Bros. v. Pennsylvania, 222 U. S. 210; Wiloil Corporation v. Pennsylvania, 294 U. S. 169.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8192660

Citations

308 U.S. 513
60 S. Ct. 139

Cited by

Michigan National Bank v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1983
W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. National Restaurant Supply Co.
Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1973
Central Transportation Company v. Atkins
Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1957
Dorsett v. Overstreet
Supreme Court of Florida · May 19, 1944
Ayrshire Patoka Collieries Corp. v. Nudelman
Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1943
Standard Oil Co. v. Department of Finance
Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1943
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Commission of Revenue & Taxation
Supreme Court of Kansas · Feb 10, 1943
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Johnson
California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1941