Opinion

Connor v. California

313 U.S. 542 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 14, 1941

Full text

Per Curiam: Frank S. Connor, pro se. The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is also denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8194522

Citations

313 U.S. 542
61 S. Ct. 844

Cited by

Karis v. Vasquez
E.D. California · Aug 5, 1993
Silvestris v. Silvestris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 16, 1965
Jackson v. State
Idaho Supreme Court · May 22, 1964
People v. Guber
New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Apr 15, 1952
Commonwealth Piccerelli v. Smith, Warden
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1942

Parentheticals

petitioner failed to show special circumstances why he should have been permitted to raise claims piecemeal
Karis v. Vasquez
rule against piecemeal attacks on judgment “admits of some modification under exceptional circumstances”
Karis v. Vasquez