Loading…

Hall v. Virginia — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hall v. Virginia

335 U.S. 875 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 6, 1948

Full text

Hall v. Virginia

Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Murphy are of opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Are, Douglas, Noted, Should
Cluster ID: 8203447

Citations

335 U.S. 875
69 S. Ct. 240

Cited by

Citizens for a Better Environment, Marc B. Anderson and Larry Hoellwarth v. City of Park Ridge
Seventh Circuit · Sep 8, 1975
Evans v. Newton
Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1966
Bell v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 9, 1962
City of Greenville v. Peterson
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Nov 10, 1961

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service