Loading…

Hickman v. Taylor — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hickman v. Taylor

93 L. Ed. 1083 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 28, 1949

Full text

Hickman, Administrator v. Taylor, ante, p. 906

Rehearing denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8203773

Citations

93 L. Ed. 1083
336 U.S. 921
69 S. Ct. 636
1949 U.S. LEXIS 2751

Cited by

Rutgard v. Haynes
S.D. California · Apr 27, 1999
Hewlett, Willie, in No. 87-1384 v. Davis, Officer Max, Badge 1186 and City of Philadelphia and Holmes, Marlene Davis, of the Estate of Davis, Max, and in Her Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Davis, Max and Davis, Fannie, Personal Representative of Davis, Max, Deceased and Doe, John And/or Doe, Mary, Administrator/administratrix, of the Estate of Davis, Max, and in Their Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Davis, Max. Hewlett, Willie v. Davis, Officer Max, Badge 1186 and City of Philadelphia and Holmes, Marlene Davis, of the Estate of Davis, Max, and in Her Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Davis, Max and Davis, Fannie, Personal Representative of Davis, Max, Deceased and Doe, John And/or Doe, Mary, Administrator/administratrix, of the Estate of Davis, Max, and in Their Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Davis, Max. Appeal of Officer Max Davis and the City of Philadelphia, In
Third Circuit · Apr 6, 1988
Hewlett v. Davis
Third Circuit · Apr 6, 1988

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service