Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co.

Barkes, J. In tbis case it is held: 1. Tbat tbe sale of tbe mill at Eond du Lac was not an interstate commerce transaction, nor was it a necessary incident to tbe carrying on of such commerce. 2. Tbat tbe contract, in so far as it involved such mill, was a contract relating to property within tbe state and was void under sec. 1770b, Stats. By the Gourt. — Judgment affirmed.