Loading…

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Litwin — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Litwin

57 N.J. Eq. 660 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1899

Full text

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Company, and v. Samuel Litwin et ux., and

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Syckel

Per Curiam. Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gum, Hendrickson, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mere, Nixon, Reversal, Syckel, Vredenburgh, Yokel
Cluster ID: 8301681

Citations

57 N.J. Eq. 660
12 Dickinson 660
1898 N.J. LEXIS 95
43 A. 1098

Cited by

Hollander v. Abrams
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 4, 1926

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service