Full text
Francis E. Larkin v. James H. Wikoff, defendant-respondents
Per Curiam.
So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.
For reversal — None.