Opinion

American Pin Co. v. Wright

85 N.J. Eq. 219 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1901

Full text

The American Pin Company, complainant-appellant v. Alfred A. Wright, defendants-respondents

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Pitney. For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogbrt, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, VobEHEES—12. For reversal—None.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Adams, Affirmance, Bogbrt, Chiee, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Krueger, None, Reversal, Syckel, Vobehees, Vredenburgh
Cluster ID: 8302695

Citations

85 N.J. Eq. 219
15 Buchanan 219
1901 N.J. LEXIS 169
98 A. 1084

Cited by

In Re Colombraro
D. New Jersey · Mar 3, 1999
VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1994
Sheeran v. Sitren
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Mar 23, 1979
Hirsch v. Phily
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Nov 23, 1949
Myers v. Forest Hill Gardens Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 18, 1928

Parentheticals

“A covenant to pay a debt ... out of an outstanding demand when collected, will not operate as an assignment, because it implies that the covenantor is to retain a control over the fund, and that more remains to be done on his part for the transfer to be effectual.”
In Re Colombraro