Opinion

Doctorman v. Schroeder

7 Stock. 676 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1921

Full text

Solomon Doctorman v. Walter L. Schroeder

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning. [682] For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Iyatzenbaci-i, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—12. For reversal—None.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Heppeni, Ieimer, Iiee, Iyatzenbaci, Kalisoi, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, White, Williams
Cluster ID: 8303059

Citations

7 Stock. 676
1921 N.J. LEXIS 250
92 N.J. Eq. 676
114 A. 810

Cited by

Marioni v. 94 Broadway, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Feb 8, 2005
Great United Realty Co. v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 30, 2001
Miceli v. Dierberg
Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1989
Gorrie v. Winters
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Nov 26, 1986
Kakalik v. Bernardo
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 9, 1981
Salvatore v. Trace
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Aug 27, 1969
Bertrand v. Jones