Miller v. Town of Montclair

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Kaliscii, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11. .For reversal — None,