Loading…

Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Co.

109 N.Y.S. 1123 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 11, 1908

Full text

BALDWIN v. SCHENECTADY RY. CO.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See 118 App. Div. 441, 103 N. Y. Supp. 514. KELLOGG, J., dissents.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8309828

Citations

109 N.Y.S. 1123

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service