Loading…

In re Cox — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

In re Cox

157 N.Y.S. 1121 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 24, 1916

Full text

In the Matter of the Application of Ethel A. COX, as administratrix, etc. William J. Cody

Motion denied for lack of power, without costs. See Parks v. Murray, 109 N. Y. 646, 16 N. E. 485.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8313853

Citations

157 N.Y.S. 1121

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service